THE REAL BIG 2020 ELECTION LIE

I was ordering a cheesesteak hoagie today and they had FOX on with the hearing with Jack Smith, and an angry Democrat, Ms. Kamlager-Dove (isn't it always the hyphenated ones?) kept declaring that the claim that the 2020 election was stolen was a big lie - again, and again, and again.  "Thou dost protest too much."  Lies stated often enough become the truth to those unable to critically think or to recognize the obvious.  The Dems and RINOs call it a lie ad infinitum because people still know in their gut that the election was indeed corrupt and almost certainly stolen, and they want to bombard and intimidate until their opposition is totally marginalized. 

The so-called origins science folks have done that with molecules-to-man evolution - they really do not care if anyone understands the hypothesis, they are simply satisfied when someone agrees to it being true. They roundly ignore all the issues with the hypothesis, including the fact that the human race would genetically become extinct within 500 generations, given the 100 changes per generation. The Bible puts the number at 200-300 generations so far and counting, while the 2.5-million-year human timeline by evolutionists would require close to 125,000 generations. They try to save their theory by saying genetic change did not occur until about 5,100 years ago, which much better aligns with human history. I have seen the graph, and all this is only one scintilla of all the evidence that works against the hypothesis (how did gender, sexuality, information, and optimally designed components with inate reproductive capabilities all arise in just the right placeswith just the right timing, and how, how, how?) Trump says he has come across massive evidence concerning the election to bolster his claims. Hopefully, enough remains that did not go the way of Hillary's emails to make his case. We need to see it. I have seen a lot, but I am sure there is much more. 

I reviewed detailed analyses by some very technical people, and I am personally positive that the election was indeed stolen. Any other explanation for the data defies reality and is suitable only for the most gullible. RINOs and Mike Pence, who were not fond of Trump, made pronouncements mimicking Dems with no evidence whatsoever. What Trump asked Pence to do was wholly legal and justified.

Of course, there are always those who bombastically claim otherwise, but I have seen zero evidence to back up their hyperbolic claims.  Here are just a few pieces of evidence:

1) The number of registered voters increased by 19% from 2008 to 2020. Yet Biden allegedly outperformed Barack Obama by 23% in terms of vote totals.  That 4% is quite telling in elections typically only won by half that margin. Joe Biden stayed in his basement, so to speak, while Obama drew large adoring crowds like Trump did twelve years later. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it almost always IS a duck!

2) Swing states illegally changed voting procedures using Covid as the all-encompassing excuse. Massive mail-in voting was allowed, which, by the way, was largely eliminated in Europe due to easy and pervasive fraud. U.S. Dems are not the only ones who cheat, but they have a near-monopoly on it here. Mass dumps into ballot boxes have been video-documented, and yet the over-confident Kamlager-Dove, immune to the obvious, soldiers on.  They also allowed votes to be counted past the deadlines - remember back in 1960 with Mayor Daley in Chicago, who famously asked, "How many more votes do we need?" I am aware of the largely uncontested analysis of how the late proven fraud in Illinois resulted in JFK rather than Nixon winning that state, but it was not enough to turn the national results. Seven swing states all magically ended up in the Biden column in 2020 by "just enough to win" margins, while all seven went to Trump in 2024, which defies even a fertile imagination.

3) Consistent 51-49 results including voting district tallies totally inconsistent with previous elections and 2024.  "Just enough to win." Counties that went for Trump in 2016 magically going for Biden like crazy.  Then in 2024, the results tracked back to agree with historical records. Amazing!

4) Vote counting halted in swing states with excuses to get rid of poll watchers. HVAC, plumbing leaks, and what not. I do not believe in multiple coincidences the SAME DAY. Do you?

5) Illegal counting by others through the night with massive ballot drops from insecure locations amazingly all for one candidate, some with repeatedly the same signatures. In Georgia, the person in charge quashed all opposition to what went on. That is on video and there is no alternative explanation for what happened.

6) Voting machines that "could not process" hundreds of times more votes that the established accuracy standard were then manually processed with one-sided results every time. In Georgia, those went over 95% for Biden in districts not given to that. Reminds me of Philly where John Kerry got 100% of the vote in some voting districts where opposition poll watchers were kicked out.

7) Biden barely campaigned, seemingly sure he was going to win (the fix was in). His strategy was not to go out there and stumble more than he had already.  We all saw the real Joe Biden in that pivotal debate in 2024. Stumbling was his way of life.

8) Court cases were dismissed based upon "lack of standing" which often seems misapplied when a court does not want to take up a case. NOT ONE to my knowledge ever dealt with any technical analysis.

9) Dominion rolled Fox for their claims on their involvement - yet the Venezuelan connection with Dominion and the way the machines were set in terms of rejections appears beyond anything accidental.

10) Alarmingly similar installment of the loser in both Brazil and Venezuela with a similar m.o.  New evidence on international players, including China, appear to have substantial evidence, but anyone interested in truth would desire we know for sure what happened so it never happens again.

MLK DAY

 Over 40 years ago, back in 1985, my wife and I started a non-profit dedicated to breaking down barriers among people - racial, economic, educational, denominational, political, etc. This ministry is totally non-denominational and has published a lot of gospel literature and produced over 3,000 radio programs.  We have a black-white marriage, and there have actually been NINE interethnic marriages in our extended family - black, white, bi-racial, Hispanic, Asian, you name it.

Due to my passion for true unity, I was often the designated speaker at church on MLK Day. I honestly would have preferred it to have been called Civil Rights Day, as that is the nature of most Federal Holidays. Even George Washington, the Founder of our nation, and Abraham Lincoln, the one who preserved the Union, do not have a day with their name on it - only "Presidents Day".   Even Christmas and Easter are not named after the Lord who left heaven to come die for us and be raised up, do not accord that honor.  Only Columbus Day, which dates back to 1792, and MLK, Jr. Day remain.  Even then, only 20 states make Columbus Day a paid holiday, and many insist on trashing Columbus Day and celebrating Indigenous Peoples Day instead.  There is a lot of P.C. behind this, as well as a total glorification of those called Native Americans, often ignoring actual history, which indicates that they are no more sainted than any other people group. There was some pretty intense violence, massive intertribal warfare, and the like, flying in the face of the prevailing peace-pipe images.  I have nothing against honoring them as much as any other people group, as ALL have sinned and come short of the glory of God. However, to demonize Columbus while practically deifying Native Americans is simply a non-starter for me.

The move a few decades ago to practically deify MLK led me to stop doing those speeches.  For the last few, I only talked about civil rights and barely mentioned his name. However, pushing him to sainthood despite the increasing hard evidence he was not a saint at all, from the testimony of his gross and. pervasive sexual immorality from Ralph Abernathy, his successor of the SCLC, confessions of others close to him, including some of the women, the note from Boston University concerning his plagiarized doctoral dissertation doctorate degree at the King Center at Stanford University, which would have been revoked if others did the same. They asked what purpose that would serve, ignoring academic integrity. 

Many have criticized the current president for his own immoralities years ago, ironically when he was a Hillary-supporting Democrat, and certainly those are blemishes as well, but the stark contrast in how Trump and King have been treated is unsettling.  Each of their achievements can be honored without white-washing their failings or making them into saints.

I have been to the King Center in Memphis, but have studied documents from Stanford. It has always bothered me that Christian evangelicals often call him a prophet, though originally they opposed him. With the rise of Malcolm X, he seemed more palatable, so it was Christian P.C. to embrace him as a fellow believer with a call on his life. However, any honest reading of his academic papers indicates he was never born again, and in fact was an enemy of the true gospel, never having preached it his entire life.  He says he was baptized at six but had no clue what it was about, simply joining others. He became a skeptic as a child, and by the age of 13, determined that Jesus Christ was not God.  Any "divinity" was simply because Jesus was doing God's work. The virgin birth and much of scripture were not in his belief system at all, and the entirety of his theological education was at apostate institutions. He leaned on theologians who denied the central beliefs of Christianity, and seemed to have never seriously studied scripture, but cherry-picked passages that were consistent with his message and interpreted them to suit his agenda. Of course, that is called eisegesis, and he is far from alone in doing that. Whether the purveyors of health and wealth on TBN and similar networks, those pushing feminism, or liberation theologians in Nicaragua and elsewhere, eisegesis is a sure-fire path to deception. Only exegesis, which seeks to take from scripture the pure, obvious, and eternal meaning, will keep one on the straight and narrow path to eternal life.  I Peter 2 warns us about people who appeal to Christians, but who have an immoral character and other issues that we need to avoid.

I find that those who are partial, who look past the sins of those they admire, fall into manifest deceptions no matter who the person is they deeply admire. That is so common today among so many that millions honor and respect, and MLK is not the slightest unique in that. The reason we point out the specifics today, though, is that we have a Federal holiday that honors him above all others, even those whose character dwarfs his. To be impartial is more than a notion, and we need to be 100% consistent in that if we are to please the Lord.